Leonard Cohen: Suzanne
[purchase]
We speak so easily of lyrics, but music and interpretation are a big part of meaning.
For example, take Suzanne, a sad tale of a second-person hero who falls in with a half-crazy temptress with a perfect body, and - as far as I can tell; Leonard Cohen's lyrical style is often oblique - catches her madness like a virus in the process. In the original version of this 1967 song, Cohen's molasses-slow delivery and lugubrious vowels flavor the lyrics with an aching tone of regret for such recklessness, and its inevitable conclusion. As the first track on Leonard Cohen's first major release, the song would come to set the tone for the incredible career that followed.
But as the history of Hallelujah amply demonstrates, the possibilities for tonal interpretation that Cohen's openly vague poetics provide are vast. Some subsequent covers of Suzanne -- and there are many -- seem to have interpreted the dream-like second verse, with its directly biblical narrative of a pitiable and lonely Jesus, as a prompt towards a more mystical approach, as if we should celebrate the way our almost-narrator openly embraces madness as a kind of visionary model for behavior. Others seem to emphasize the woman, as if the cost did not truly matter, as if to say that love is a madness well worth embracing. Here's a couple of samples, just to prove how much tonal shift can matter to meaning:
Nina Simone: Suzanne
[purchase]
Peter Gabriel: Suzanne
[purchase]
Neil Diamond: Suzanne
[purchase]
The 50 Best Cover Songs of 2024
1 day ago
2 comments:
Nice post (both here and at CLD.) I find that trying to write about monolithic musical personas (like Cohen) are kind of tricky- how do you not just repeat everybody else. Good, succinct coverage of what makes the song special in composition, performance, and cultural context.
Now THAT is a comment. Thanks, BK.
Also: this post now available with added Neil Diamond! Thanks to BWR for the bonus bonus late addition. Not necessarily to my taste, but the pop-lite stylings of ol' Neil help prove my point rather nicely, don't you think?
Post a Comment